BFBC2 was...uhhhhhhhh oh dear

[gamings_best]

Slimebeast said:

gamings_best said:
canceled my per-order after the beta, god I hope they don't ever ever ever refer to this game for battlefield 3, not even the destruction.

It's clear they want a chunk of MW2 crowd, so the dumbed the crap down of battlefield.

Bad company 1 remains the closet thing to a battlefield game consoles will ever see, and even that's still a far cry.

What was wrong with it?

easily the worst class system implemented in a class based shooter, they might as well just let you choose anything and just made them custom loadouts, no health, stupid re-gen, no knife, gernade spam, graphics are crap (no that's no cammo -_-), controls are funky, damage system takes a page outta MW2's book. Now in no way did I expect this to be BF3, but I did expect it to better than MW2, still a battlefield experience,

bad company 1 problem was it didn't have nearly as much content as expected from a battlefield game, I thought bad company 2 would just add that content, but nope, a whole new game, seeing how EA were so gung-ho about beating MW2 I should I probly expected something was up. They made a battlefield game that the MW2 guy would enjoy, Not a battlefield game for Battlefield gamers, as the op has said, this isn't for the core gamer.