ChronotriggerJM said:
Killzone 1 was overhyped because the PS3 needed a "killer FPS", so did it let down being a "halo killer"? Of course :D the fanbase of halo is absurdly huge. Was it a decent game? Yeah it was :) I enjoyed it ^_^. Killzone Liberation however is a GREAT game, definitely worth owning in my opinion. And about Killzone 2, almost EVERY review site/person thats gotten there hands on with it has given nothing but praise. There is no reason why this game doesn't have the possibility of delivering. Overhyped? Sure, but I have a feeling it will be a solid game. The first one was. |
Lair received a lot of praise from sites that got a hands on with it, so much praise that when I mentioned my doubts (based on Star Wars: Rogue Squadren 3) I got flamed because eveyone knew Lair was going to be a 90%+ AAA game ... It is fairly easy to produce a game that is interesting in a 5 minute single player segment, and trivial when you have an audience (like game reviewers) who are willing to accept a lot of problems because the project is months away from being delivered.
Killzone was an average game for the PS2 and the development team failed to deliver on the product they promised even though it was a much smaller, more manageable, project; I think it is (amazingly) optimistic to assume a developer can quadruple the size of their development team and deliver a product at a quality level far higher than they ever have before.







