Garnett said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:
Garnett said:
Boutros said:
Garnett said:
UC2 is overrated IMO.I played it, the story is ok but the MP is awful. The graphics are not "Only possible on PS3" type, its just colorful thats it.
@Carl
"If you like something your a fanboy, if you dislike something your a troll"
|
Uncharted 2 multiplayer horrible?
...
No.
|
Yes.
It sucks, you lose money for leaving, its impossible to aim the game, the AK has accuracy like a MG42 on a treadmill.
|
wow,
It may be over-rated for you,I can let that part live,but the graphics still haven't been surpassed by ANY console game so far. The attention to detail in that game is unparalled but you just think "its colourful, thats all".
SPOILERS
Did we play the same game ? What did you see when you got to the top of that rooftop in Nepal ? Did you see how beautiful Shambala was ?
One time I died because I was looking at the environment and not on the action going on..Chapter 4 when you're running away from Flynn's men...
|
UC2- The textures are bland and have very little detail, the environments are just colorful thats it. The lighting effects are good but there not KZ2. Its just that far away it appears to have more detail.
And UC2 is just colorful thats it, KZ2 has better graphics, its like saying "Mario galaxy > Gears"
|
I could have agreed if you said character models weren't that good...cause some of them aren't , but if you're comparing TEXTURES - Uncharted 2 is teh BEAST !
Even Uncharted 1 had brill textures, U can see the details in the bottom of a river - and when you talk about detail, what about those masks in Nepal, and those statues in the "Path of Light" chapter...if that isn't detailed enough for you then I don't know what is....
And we haven't talked about the Snow yet.....
It looks better than ME2, thats for sure...but I agree - KZ2 looks greater than U2 in some areas such as lighting and those particle effects...but overall U2 is marginally better.
