By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Icyedge on 04 February 2010
Edit Thread
dsister44 said:
Icyedge said:
dsister44 said:
Icyedge said:

Im playing the game right now and its better than titles like infinite undiscovery (7.1 on ign), enchanted arms (6.5 on ign) or star ocean 4 (8 on ign) so I say that you shouldnt listen to IGN.

So... any reason why your opinion is better then their opinion? Which is exactly what their review is(an opinion)

Because I played nearly all jRPGs from the past 15 years on every console. This guy maybe dont like even like jRPG.

Why would they let someone that doesn't like jRPG review a jRPG?

I dont know, it was just sarcasm. But its not that I dont agree this game could be 5.1. Its more that I dont agree this game is 5.1 when they rate other games not better at 7-8. I know its different persons reviewing different games but the reviewers in the same company should have specific points in order to evaluate. Also there should be scale on how to weight each review points in the overall score. This game has no lasting appeal problem, but he give 6.5. Also 7 in graphics? God of war collection (a ps2 title with upscale graphics) got an 8 from the same site. Its a poor review because he was clearly hating on everything since he dont like the gameplay and was disapointed.