By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zucas said:
MontanaHatchet said:
Zucas said:
MontanaHatchet said:
I was actually going to go off here, but I'll let the half dozen other people tell you how wrong you are (like they just did). My life is so easy.

Haha you couldn't have pulled it off anyways but effort counts.  But the rest of us are actually have a civilized conversation if you ever wish to inject some logic in and join a very interesting discussion.

Wow, your arrogance is incredible. You used to be one of my favorite members, but you've become so cocky and bullish that you've gone way downhill in my eyes. After ripping apart your arguments (even the stupid part about technology vs. social progress, which you had no good rebuttal for), you still act like somehow you were winning our debates, or that I'm illogical.

So how is it up there on your idealogical throne? Comfy? We're all trying to explain to you why the thing you described doesn't happen. I've already explained it through my posts. What else is there to say?

Wow all you did was commit a false dichotomy and you act like your entire world has been flipped upside down.  Man up.  It's getting pathetic. 

Now, I'm willing to hear your argument again if you don't mind posting it, again but you act as if you making a mistake is impossible.  No one is infallible.

I didn't. And you're proving my point, by the way. Not just with this post, but your previous one. Let me quote you:

"Well my answer to that is once again you are pretending you have exhausted all options when clearly you haven't. It's a good thing I'm smart enough to know that, otherwise this world would be in an even worse situation."

The italicized and underlined line demonstrates exactly what I'm talking about. I mean, what happened? You got to college and now you think you're some kind of idealistic genius, or something? Get over yourself. By the way, I already posted my argument several posts back. You've still failed to provide a decent rebuttal, just how I'm wrong and you're right with no decent explanation (again). While I'd love to completely re-write my debate (due to you being lazy), I don't want to have it answered with more questions and idealogical cliches.