soulsamurai said:
How about this with all the arguing?
A thread dedicated to "MAG's Score in it's current state?"
Someone who plays the game regularly and who is impartial can adjust scores accordingly.
Socom is a good example of what i mean. I own the game and loved the first ones, but when it first came out i thought it was worth a score of 46. Now with all of the updates etc i think it deserves a solid 7.0 no higher no less.
Mag Right now I think deserves a 8
It's a really fun game, controls and etc i think are fine except the knife seems reallly off. I think it does what promised, but i know there can be improvements and as far as the comment Zipper saying they arn't going to support it there was just a thread a few minutes ago an interview saying they were still making stuff for the game...I can't find it atm though If i do I'll edit it in.
|
So someone who is biased towards the game should tell everyone what they think of it?
One of two things would happen:
- The person doesn't like it and only plays it because of the thread. The score stays the same or actually goes down.
- The loves the game so they keep playing it. You can find someone that loves even the worst games and they will rate it high. The person who keeps up with the thread obviously loves it and is more biased than any review you find. Each time thier's any update it goes up 0.2-0.5 until it steadies out at a 9-ish.
I really doubt #1 would happen, it would probably be #2.
