By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
radiantshadow92 on 02 February 2010
Edit Thread
twesterm said:
radiantshadow92 said:
twesterm said:
Thechalkblock said:
dsister44 said:
Thechalkblock said:
I'm questioning the legitimacy of these reviews honestly. The game allows 256 players, of course it won't be perfect upon release. I think it's very possible this game will be a lot better than a big reviewer's 7.

So what are you saying? That they shouldn't review the game at all. Or that they should give it a ten because it might get better

Neither. I'm saying reviews for this game might be even more pointless than reviews usually are. Don't get me wrong, I could care less about this game; it isn't my type of thing. The situation the game's in is just a prime example of the lack of game review credibility.

Did you actually read the review?  They actually talk about how they had to wait a week so they could review the game because they didn't want to base their review on the beta and wanted to wait on being able to play the actual game with actual people with the servers open.

I don't really get your reasoning for not trusting the review.

he is saying how the game is more than likely to get patched and get better along with time as the community grows...just like the other socom game, it isnt the game game that got like a 5 on IGN anymore, its 70+ material now, so as time passes by MAG become a better game....he not saying that they shouldnt have reviewed it or anything, but that the review should not be a staple that goes along with the word MAG

Did you read the end of the review?  It also talks about how Zipper has announced no plans for support on the game.  I'm sure there will be something, but it's crazy to assume it's going to change the game from a 7 to even an 8+

Whatever the case, a non-review doesn't help anyone trying to buy the game now.  What do you think reviews are actually for?  E-penis waving wars on forums or people trying to decide if they want to buy the game?

People who are looking to buy the game now aren't interested in what the game will be in 6 months from now, they would rather want to know what it is right now.  If the game did need 6 months to become an 8+ plus game and you think it's unfair it gets rated this low now and then not changed, then perhaps they should have had the forsight to not release the game yet.

jesus, would you calm down >_> seriously man....dont reply to me if your going to be sarcastic and try to make me look like an idiot, ITS a forum, so relax, and have a friendly debate for once in your life

 

anyways, I DID READ THE REVIEW, and i know that Zipper is going to patch the game, they always do, what else are they gonna do, leave it and start a new ip outta nowhere? no, if anything, if there is any developer that loves thier community its zipper....and btw, i know that even if future reviews came out, i am sure no one would care, I NEVER said they would....but thats not the point, which is what you are missing, the point is that i was intrepreting thechalkblocks post so that maybe you would get it, but i guess you didnt, because instead of going "oh i see what you mean, but still it wont matter", you reply with a sarcastic post >_>