twesterm said:
Did you actually read the review? They actually talk about how they had to wait a week so they could review the game because they didn't want to base their review on the beta and wanted to wait on being able to play the actual game with actual people with the servers open. I don't really get your reasoning for not trusting the review. |
Sure they waited, but was it long enough? Nowadays games are released incomplete, it's just the way it is. They're updated and fixed after release. In other words they reviewed a version of the game that isn't yet complete. Many games are updated, receive extra content, are tweaked, etc. and become better games than they originally were. A review can only review the version of the game that currently exists. If MAG is fixed up in a couple months and turns out to become an exceptional game, is IGN going to update it's review for the game? No.
Reviewers can't just go around updating their game reviews whenever a game is fixed, of course. What does this say about the legitimacy of the review? The review becomes nothing more than an impression for the incomplete version of a game. It takes the validity of the review away in comparison to the final package.
I'm not saying it's right for games to be released incomplete, but the fact remains unchanged that the game will most likely be fixed and subsequently better.
I don't mistrust the review, but rather disregard it.