NJ5 said:
Exactly... but what they seem to be doing is attempting a re-education of gamers to accept a decrease in their rights while keeping game prices unchanged. They do this via progressively more restrictive DRM (a few years ago you got unlimited installations, today you get 15 installs, in a year you get 5 installs, then 3, etc.). They may not succeed entirely, but it's probably better for their profits than immediately doing it the way you proposed. I for one do not agree with what they're doing, which is why, for example, I wouldn't buy a game on Steam at full price. I like Steam and its convenience, but this doesn't mean I'm willing to accept a non-resellable item for the same price. I do this as a matter of principle by the way, because I don't resell my games (or at least I haven't done so yet).
|
The positives on Steam outway the negatives... it does have a few. Of course as previously stated... I don't sell my games anyway.
The biggest disadvantage i see is the inability to lend the game. Of course las time i lent a freakin PC game to one of my friends he returned the damn thing in 8 pieces and said "That's the way he found it when i lent it to him." Yeah, like he's just going to go a month and a half not telling me that's how the game was when i gave it to him. How does one even break a CD into pieces anyay?
Anyway, not having to worry about the physical problems with CDs is nice. Of course this is in the US, where backup laws aren't quite as nice as where your from.