By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Masakari said:
arsenicazure said:
Now here is the crazy part. If the 360 was announced in 2005, wasnt it kinda obvious that the PS3 was on the way? Square could have started dev on PC specs or even the 360 and then ported it over!

1.5 yrs is a lot of time and money wasted.

It also goes to show that maintaining platform loyalty for no apparent reason is bad business. The 360 moved forward earlier, and SE usually ignored PC as well, and it seems some sort of miscommunication with Sony cost them a lot of money and dev time. Like you said, if they had started on PC development and also eyed the 360 earlier, they would have been in a much better position. Putting all your eggs in one basket out of some misguided brand loyalty is bad business - I can understand if they got money or dev incentives, but clearly that's not what happened here.

Maybe this is the reason Square has been moving away from Sony - they got pissed for Sony not informing them accurately about their console plans?

i agree losing 1.5 year of time and money is realy bad planning. 

 

But... What did SE say about Sony to imply the relationship was troubled? They are putting strong support behind the PS3.



In the wilderness we go alone with our new knowledge and strength.