PS3 smoothing beyond that of high-end PC graphics card

[raygun]

 

meehan666 said:

raygun said:
BS? What BS? The question was "could the PS3 run Crysis on say low setting's"? That's LOW SETTINGS. And the DF article sums up: "CryTek's technical showcase on console is an intriguing mix of sub-medium-level settings for some elements, all the way up to "very high" in others." Sounds like that's somewhat better than LOW settings, so where's the BS?

YOU - "They have the Crysis 2 engine running on PS3 and 360, and it looks great, better than Crysis 1 engine"

That's the BS. The Cryengine 2 on consoles has not matched Crysis 1 graphics, let alone surpassed them.

 

Well, does the Cryengine 3 on console look better than Crysis 1- ON LOW SETTINGS ?? THAT WAS THE QUESTION! Have you tried Crysis ! on LOW SETTINGS, pretty sad. Hell, I think Farcry2 on PS3 looked better than Crysis 1,on low, med and maybe even some high settings. I haven't played Crysis in a few years, I don't think it's the ultimate graphically now any way, there's many new game engines out today that look great, and have some better features. Was the snow in Uncharted 2 better than in Crysis? Wasn't the water in Uncharted 1 much more advanced than in Crysis? (You actually went upstream, up waterfalls, it wasn't flat). I think they could duplicate a Crysis map in quite a few other engines, even Uncharted2's. Any way, isn't fun to argue?