By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dahuman on 30 January 2010
Edit Thread
Kasz216 said:
Xoj said:
Kasz216 said:
Heck, it could of even been the PS3 version that was lacking in graphics. Afterall there have been many of multi-platform games that looked worse on PS3.

Your just making unfounded accusations and claims.

then uncharted 2, killzone 2 are what?

look better than FF13 =(

I don't get your point here... From what i've seen there are better looking 360 games too.  Mass Effect 2 for example looks better (if you ask me.) 

True or not True.  Early in this generation, for the first few titles companies put out the 360 version more often then not looked better then the PS3 version as they cut their teeth?

 

True or not True.  FF13 has been in development since... well before this generation began.  Therefore it started development back when developers were having these problems?

 

True or not True.  Square Enix has no PS3 games released?

 

Is it not reasonable to think they would have the same problems pretty much every third party had when it came to the much harder to develop for PS3?

 

Well, playing ME2 on high res on PC pretty much allowed me to notice that while the PC version looks better, they shared a lot of the same assets with the 360 version most likely, I can see a lot of low res textures(even with 16x AF, it's..... an eyesore,) very "clean" surroundings, limited amount of poly counts, if anything, it's just good ol' UE3.x with decent shaders and art directions, and some extra effects on PC at a higher resolution. I'm very much enjoying the game of course, but if you are trying to tell me that ME2 on 360 looks better than UC2 or KZ2, I have to say that's purely a style choice, if you are talking on a technical level, not even close.

I for one believe that FF13 would have looked better if it was PS3 exclusive because it's able to push more polygons and have full HDR, but alas, that's not the case here, it's still pre-ordered of course.