iWarMachine said:
Kasz216 said:
Xoj said:
Kasz216 said:
Heck, it could of even been the PS3 version that was lacking in graphics. Afterall there have been many of multi-platform games that looked worse on PS3.
Your just making unfounded accusations and claims. |
then uncharted 2, killzone 2 are what?
look better than FF13 =(
|
I don't get your point here... From what i've seen there are better looking 360 games too. Mass Effect 2 for example looks better (if you ask me.)
True or not True. Early in this generation, for the first few titles companies put out the 360 version more often then not looked better then the PS3 version as they cut their teeth?
True or not True. FF13 has been in development since... well before this generation began. Therefore it started development back when developers were having these problems?
True or not True. Square Enix has no PS3 games released?
Is it not reasonable to think they would have the same problems pretty much every third party had when it came to the much harder to develop for PS3?
|
So...How do you explain the downgrade of graphics shown in earlier videos?
and HOW do you explain that the ps3 version looks more clear and sharp without framerate dips?
|
A) Wait... I thought you said "They look the same". Now the PS3 version looks more sharp and plays better?
B) I haven't seen any downgrade of graphics shown in earlier videos.
Though you know... such things could of been changed because there was no way to NOT get framerate drops if they didn't change it.
Or for that matter, they needed to lower things like texturing to make all the assets be of the same level that were created.
Or ran out of time.
Plenty of reasons more as well.
