sethnintendo said:
I disagree. Let them pay the big bucks for nothing in return (Sure Sony won the generations with PS1 and PS2 but what about now, any short term gain doesn't equal long term). You might think it is monopolistic practice to deny consumers right to purchase a game on a certain console. If that is all a company has going for itself then eventually they will meet reality. Sure Sony and Microsoft made great strides in console gaming by buying out games for their systems but what has that left them with this generation. Both Sony and Microsoft find themselves at the crossroads. The only thing I know is Nintendo has it's own studios that a far superior and doesn't give a damn if a third party game goes exclusive since they can produce just as good or better quality.
Main point is Sony and Microsoft rely on third party more heavily than Nintendo.... |
Your thinking seems confused there. I understand your point on Nintendo, and that's why I say if any console provider wants to make it different they need to do it themselves, either with unique hardware - as Nintendo did with Wii - or your own IP - which both Nintendo and Sony do more than MS.
But to figure it's better for the consumer to suffer while a company sorts itself out or waits for some 'comeupance' doesn't make sense to me. Why on Earth would you want that?
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...







