By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LordTheNightKnight said:
"Cost isn't the most important thing if you were nuts about playing a lightsaber game with realistic motion control. If you already had a PS3, the choice becomes a lot simpler."

You mentioned the cost of the Motion+, so ignoring the cost of doing the same on the PS3 is not fair.

"If I have two versions of the same game using comparable 1:1 controls, then I'm going to buy the one with the better resolution and graphics. There's no reason to buy a downscaled version unless you were really attached to the Wii."

That's false because it assumes there are not other factors. Any Wii game costs less, for one. The scale wouldn't matter for 1 on 1 battles. Loading times would also be shorter. If there is any moving around, using the nunchuck would be more comfortable than using the gamepad in one hand.

So don't give me that crap about the only possible reason being how one feels. Even if you don't intend it, that's the same BS logic Wii bashers use.

There hasn't been a game for me personally worth buying M+ add ons at any price. That is a very fair statement.

Even buying them for $10 is a waste if there aren't any games I'm interested in playing that require the attachment. There will be at least one game in the near future that will make it worth my time, but not right now.

Ninendo is about as notorious for releasing a lot of add on peripherals as Nintendo fans are for buying them, even when not fully warranted (Wii Speak, Wii Zapper, Balance Board, Motion Plus, Vitality Sensor). Even I own a Wii Zapper (no longer used) and a Wii Balance Board (no longer used) and I am by no means a loyal Nintendo "fan."

You're clearly emotional about Nintendo, so there's no point in arguing with your personal preferences. But for those who aren't in your category, Nintendo doesn't offer all the best solutions, and in the near future, they won't have the entire motion control market to themselves either.