NFL Prediction League

[Conflict_Beast]

Sephiroth357 said:

Conflict_Beast said:

Sephiroth357 said:

Conflict_Beast said:
Yes i agree. I never said a win but not 31 to 3

The Vikings won by 31.

And secondly, losing by 1, or losing by 31 is the same. You lose, you lose. No one will care the next week. All they'll remember is that your team lost.

 

Look at us. No one cares if we lost by 3. All you hear is that we lost.

Lol wow and Jboy was banned for trolling? Here u are tryin to start an argument 

I didn't insult you. I, simply corrected you. The score was 34-3, not 31-3.

"Sorry u failed.. Just like ur trophy card-This isn't trolling/Flaming?

Cowboys simply lost because our left tackle got injured and Jared Allen took advantage of a player who never played the position before.. But think what u want cuz I'll give u multiple links of where they discuss it. First two drives went into Viqueens territory and were successful. Then as soon as our LT went down Jared Allen forced Romo out of the pocket every time causing him sacks and fumbles. ANYTIME a QB get flushed out of the pocket constantly like that, they won't do good. So no u have no clue what ur talkin about"

Secondly he wasn't banned for starting an argument. He was banned for flaming.

 

And you were arguing that the Cowboys would have done better if Adams had played. He wouldn't have given the Cowboys the win as you stated. So, why does it matter? A lose is a lose.

Ok he was comparing his trophy card to urs cuz compared to his urs does fail(Also find it funny u no longer have one lmao :P) And by saying u have no clue what you are talking about is similar to about 10 posts ago when u said somethin bout Crimson not knowing a few things about football or sports or whatever. And also weren't u just sayin the Vikings lost with 4 or so turnovers and if it werent for them they prolly woulda won?(correct me if wrong) but now when it comes to Dallas to u "A LOSS is a LOSS"(Not lose) and the Vikings simply LOST just like Dallas did. Anymore things u wanna state to contradict urself?