selnor said:
Mazty said:
Lord Flashheart said: Ok Jede, Ok. |
Quit with the name constant name calling; you're like a stoned kid obsessed with tin foil. Someone said ME2 was the best graphics ever seen on a console. I said this wasn't true because:
1i)It's graphics, from high res screenshots, highlight many technical short comings e.g. soft shadows, anti aliasing, low res textures in the surrounding, a reliance on bump mapping etc ii) This is backed by the fact the game runs almost perfectly on an old GPU, the 8800GT 2)The 360 simply isn't as powerful as the PS3. Naughty Dog have said this, Guerilla Games, Sucker Punch Productions, Santa Monica Studio, and John Carmack. 3) It would be rare for a non-exclusive title to be the most graphically demanding game on a console due to the optimisation that goes into exclusives. It's cheaper and easier not to optimise.
I never have said the 360 isn't a good console, or that ME2 isn't a good game. You can choose to prefer ME2's graphical direction in comparison to Uncharted 2, but it isn't as technically demanding, which some how people reguard as flamebaiting.
|
Sorry but please show me where Carmack says PS3 is more powerful? I showed you the quote from him less than 7 months ago where he clearly said PS3 and 360 Cpu are the same in the end, but 360 GPU is a bit more powerful. How is that PS3 is more powerful. As for the other devs. I dont trust them. They will say whatever to sell more PS3's because thats what games they make.
|
So basically you don't trust any dev that supports the PS3 strictly because...they support the PS3? It seems to me that if you don't like something regardless of how factual it is, you reject it as falsehood and that sir is just fanboy logic.