Slimebeast said:
disolitude said:
Slimebeast said:
disolitude said:
3D is awesome.
I am so pissed that Mass Effect 2 on PC doesn't support a controller. Otherwise I'd be playing the PC version in 3D on my PC using Nvidia 3D vision.
If PS3 can do this and do it right...count me in. |
So u do think 3D is awesome? Make up your mind already. Cos from other posts it seems u were a lil disappointed in it.
Btw, I think ur the only one on VGC who has 3D in your home. Cool huh?
|
lol...I always said 3d is awesome. PC 3D gaming that is.
Console 3D though has my scepticism :)
I just don't believe PS3 and 360 can get the frame rate up to do proper 3D in 720p. You just can't do uncharted 2 or Gears 2 at 60 frames per second without some sort of a trickery which will shortchange the experience... on the PC however I can do full 1080p 3D if I want to and have enough video horsepower to run most games on high detail.
|
Now Im confused again by the frame rate demands... So is 60fps output by the console enuff if the monitor does 120Hz? Cos some ppl say the game needs to be rendered in 120fps or else the pic will flicker - or if it's 60fps render from the GOU, the monitor needs to double the frame rate (if the monitor has that ability that is).
Cos if 60fps is enuff then console games could well do 3D. Like Rage will do steady 60fps.
|
the TV needs to do 120 hz so you don't get a headache. It shows 60 hz flickering image to each eye. Any less and you'd go dizzy or blind...or both :)
In game 120 fps would be ideal but it won't happen any time soon so the game can get away with some slack and do 60 FPS. This equals to 30 FPS per eye. Current TVs have 60 hz and games run at 30 fps. 3D games will need to run on 120 hz TVs at 60 fps. Everything just doubles.
