By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mazty on 27 January 2010
Edit Thread
Lord Flashheart said:

Ok. The problem like i've said is you see only what you want to see. You ignore and go off on tangents or backtrack to suit yourself. You are a brick wall and I'm talking to it. there is no point continuing with you for these reasons unless it's to have a laugh. that is why i keep responding. To amuse myself because I cannot take you seriously.

 

For instance you said

And

Mazty said:

From what I can see from the first 12 mins of gameplay on youtube in HD, on the 360 there is still little to none AA, flat textures, 'simple' lighting (in todays standards) and low poly models, but plenty of bloom. The close up at 11:27 shows that a lot of the nice lighting is nothing more than good texturing & bump mapping, which dissappears close up. The required PC specs say an 8800GT GPU and from what I can see, that's the kind of graphics the game is producing.

Now compare that to what someone who OWNS and is PLAYING the game says

CGI-Quality said:
Lord Flashheart said:
So tell us CGI, does it have no AA, low poly models, flat textures and no field of depth?

No sir. It has all of the above, though at times there's a bit, and I mean a BIT, of aliasing. Textures aren't flat, character models have much bump mapping and detail, and the depth of field is nearly as good as Uncharted 2's IMO. The game is absolutely gorgeous and is definitely up there with the best that consoles have to offer. I just wouldn't put it ahead of the best that I've seen.

But again, I'm not trying to take jabs at the game, you can really see that a lot of hard work went into it.

Edit: What I meant was, it doesn't have those problems that someone claimed they had, besides a bit of aliasing.

Now I know it's only CGI saying this and he can be a bit one sided at times but even then I would still listen to him and take his opinion on board and he's not the only one saying this about ME2. Whereas you seem to be the only person oblivious to it all.

And where are you getting your inforamtion from? Youtube. That says it all.

Also I try to listen to CGI as much as I can but sometimes... well.

 

 

Fair enough youtube isn't a great source, but still, there is no AA which is a joke, in my eyes the textures aren't high resolution enough to give depth but I'm used to professional level graphics. Plus the surrounding's are lacking detail - something which even youtube can show, as if something is simple, it looks simple and vice-versa. Though I have yet to see it for myself so I'll wait till then, but as I've said, 60fps on an 8800GT? Can't be a good sign, plus no AA really is going to shoot any game graphically in the foot, and more so at 720p. That can't be denied.

Still with the name calling? Nice to see such a high level of maturity from yourself.

Plus out of sheer curiosity, any chance you or someone can find a screenshot with the DoF effect going on? Would like to see it is all.

 

@lestatdark

Nice to see you have listed where I'm wrong with my 'facts'. If you don't like it, e.g. power of the consoles, fair enough, you are entitled to but don't complain unless it's a lie. If it is a lie then it's fair game to point out how that is so. All that's generally has happend so far is disagreement with no substance & hollering of "flamming". Not cool.