selnor said:
I do to have alot of respect for CGI. But I cant help but feel there is PS3 favouritism there to. Considering what so many different sites are saying about ME2 graphics. In particular to, it's also teaching the industry how cinamatic gaming is really done. You only have to look at the consistantcy within completely different reviews. Vistas best ever. Visuals best ever. Visuals like a blockbuster high production movie. This is not one reviewer. But at least 70% of the board have come out with statements like this. Hell I have 4 easy in my sig. |
I understand, and I certainly don't mind people preferring Mass Effect's visuals to Uncharted's. But frankly, I also can't help but feel the reviewers are just speaking in general. I mean, "One of the best" does not necessarily = the best. Neither me, nor CGI are denying it's one of the best looking games out there on consoles right now.
My opinion is the same as CGI's judging from youtube videos. Which is that the character models (or facial model, at least) is ahead of Killzone 2, but just behind Uncharted 2. Cloth detail is the same as the other 2 games. Depth of field is just the same as Uncharted 2. But animations, lighting, and environment detail are where it just lags behind, especially the lighting. Now the presentation, acting, and that other stuff are a totally different story, and once again, neither one of us are trying to downplay that area either. But the majority who did play Uncharted 2 would agree the VA is amongst the best. If you don't agree, that's fine. But it's the same case as with the visuals. We're not trying to downplay the game, but I really feel the visuals to Mass Effect 2 fall just completely short of Uncharted 2, and is ahead of Killzone 2 in certain areas, but behind in other aspects (mainly the lighting).
Hopefully, the game will be in my hands today, so I'll find out first hand today.
Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!
Kojima: Come out with Project S already!
