By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CrazzyMan said:

Some more "bullshots":
http://medialib.computerandvideogames.com/screens/screenshot_184440.jpg
http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/5193/screenshot184443bq2.jpg
http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/1779/screenshot184439jt4.jpg

some in motion:
http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/4681/killzonecv6.gif
http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/2451/1184432291zv3.gif

That think that pic of killzone looks better than the actual game as it actually has color.
Like this one? http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p242/Shirley_Temple_2006/1380killzone.jpg

Nothing shown so far about the game leads me to believe that it will take the genre in interesting directions,

So, Halo 3 lead FPS somehwere? But still a GOOD game. So, Gears of War Delivered, Bioshock Delivered, Halo 3 delivered, WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THAT Killzone 2 WON`T Deliver???


 Hmm, that's a hard one. Why in the world would anyone question Killzone 2 when games by Epic (the makers of Unreal), Irrational (makers of System Shock 1 and 2) and Bungie (Halo series, Marathon, Myth) have delivered? After all, if those 3 developers with their creme de la creme track record can deliver, why couldn't Guerilla, with their FINE track record of Nam' 67 and Killzone 1, deliver?

 

In case the sarcasm was missed, you're comparing companies known for some of the best offerings in their genre against one whose track record runs from shitty to average at best. Why won't Killzone 2 deliver? Because the developers previous games have sucked, and all the money and pretty graphics hasn't changed the fact that most ppl think their games have not been that fun to play.