By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Sephiroth357 on 26 January 2010
Edit Thread
allaboutthegames885 said:
Sephiroth357 said:
allaboutthegames885 said:
Sephiroth357 said:
Thank god.

Realgm is the place to go for people with some sort of sports knowledge.

And yet, they too think that CrimsonRevolver and amp316 is in the right, most likely... History or not, it's still pathetic that your Vikings are performing as prolifically as an expansion team from 8 years ago as far as World Championships are concerned (and don't tell me that the Super Bowl isn't a World Championship game, as it's to the NFL as the World Series is to Major League Baseball, and furthermore by design)...

When you use the word "title" for the NFL, it means more than just the superbowl.

Division, Confrence titles anyone?

 

I stated this awhile back. 

 

The Texans and Vikings don't have the same amount of titles. This is a fact. There's evidence to back this up.

Why would you argue against this?

 

I'm not talking about Conference Titles (while they do carry some weight), I'm talking about World Championships, of which the Vikings lack a single one, as do the Texans... And any logic stating that NO TEAM has won a World Championship in American Football is faulty, as what is a Super Bowl if not a World Championship in Professional American Football?

By Amp316

I suppose that you think that the Vikings would have done better with Jackson or Rosenfels playing instead of Favre, right?

Don't worry.  They still have as many titles as the Texans.

 

And here's the link if you don't believe me.

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3089721&page=13&postnum=25

CrimsonRevolver was trying to say that the Vikings and Texans both have 0 Superbowl championships for nearly 10 posts. I wasn't arguing that point, but he/she kept going there and ignoring the fact that the Texans don't have as many titles as the Vikings.

You jumped to conclusions rather fast, wouldn't you say?