By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Akvod on 26 January 2010
Edit Thread
selnor said:
CGI-Quality said:
Akvod said:
I don't really appreciate selnor, how you'll jump at any game and love it just so you can bash Killzone 2, Uncharted 2, Heavy Rain, or GT5.

My love for this game is based on actually looking forward to the gameplay, not to make my internet dick seem bigger. I've stuck to supporting this game for the past few months, because I actually put a lot of weight where I put my support into. My support isn't cheap.

You have been hyping up so many games in such quick succession that it makes it feel very unbelievable that you truly are fans of all of them. Your fervor isn't based on passion for the countless games you hype up solely on graphics, but your passion to start arguments and conflicts where they're not needed.

I would like everyone, not to focus so much on the beautiful graphics, but the application of Destruction 2.0, integration of infantry and vehicular based combat, team oriented gameplay, all in a large and varied map.

He's a friend of mine and all but I unfortunately have to agree with this.

The only problem is people forget when I say good. I think probably because I'm a 360 fan. Example:

In my top 10 graphics list for the gen so far in December, I put Uncharted 2 at number 1. Noone noticed this at all, and slated where I put MW2. 2nd KZ2 was not my cup of tea, but I again had that at number 1 before christmas last year.

CGI knows I have never slated Heavy Rain, In fact I am very intrigued to play it. As for GT5. I have evry GT game up to 5. To me they have all gone downhill, or more to the point never evolved. GT5 looks to evolve, but instead of weather effects etc, I want them to get the mechanics right. I dont want 120 hertz gameplay from the physics engine ( GT5P ). I'm used to the more precise control and feel of 360 or more. I want tyre deformation ( the most important part of the car is tyres, they touch the road ). Etc etc. I dont want to argue here in this thread about these games, but I am simply defending myself. Many people see it as bashing. Only because I disagree with top graphics as of now? Or that Rage and Bad Company both have phenominal engines which to me are doing things far more impressive than textures or lighting?
 Try not to forget what Ive actually awarded these games in the past guys.

EDIT: @ Akvod

You assume I posted this for graphics. When I made no indication of that at all. I actually thought the game itself looked EPIC. It was everyone else that posted in here about it being up there with Crysis not me. A few disagree, but the majority of posts are about how awesome it looks. Dont single me out when I didnt even post about graphics till page 3?!

Yes yes, I'll disregard everything you said after page 3, what you said on this page, and the one before that, and the countless threads you have made in your long history here.

As much as this game desperately needs hype, you're the last person I wish would do so, since you don't actually care about Bad Company 2, just like all those other forgotten PC/360 games you've hyped up. I don't want fucking shit like this:

"Um, you do know KZ2's destruction is only superficial ( you cant bring down ANY building in the game ) and the big destruction points are scripted right? Means it barely taxes the game engine. Bad Company 2's is destruction of anything. You can wipe out any building. You know level it. That is very taxing."

THIS IS ABOUT BAD COMPANY 2, NOT ABOUT KILLZONE 2. You're telling people to look AWAY from the game with your inflamatory messages when I want people to look AT Bad Company 2.

 

Now I understand why KylieDog didn't appreciate the Modern Warfare 2 comparisons. It's because of people like you, Geoff, and those who don't care about the game itself, but just the conflict.