Lord Flashheart said:
*sigh* ok hopefully this'll be the last time i respond to you as you are very dense. I was replying to your statement (I think I said that) about the ram being low (yep I did, and several times as well) and you was not technical at all (couldn't twist facts to suit your arggument) you said nothing about speed (only when i tripped you up again did you move the goalpost) only the short comment involving size. or can you show me where in youroriginal statement did you mention speed? edit: I know you don't like quoting actual statements to back your comments. You prefer to go of on a tangent and close the gate to the path we was previously on. |
"You was not technical"
And I think that sums up the kind of intellectual superman I am conversing with. You clearly don't understand RAM if you think speed & size are seperate & not part of the overall performance of the RAM. Go learn about it rather than showing a total lack of understanding.
Sony have said it, Carmack has said it: the PS3 is more powerful than the 360. Now please, accept this fact and move on with your little life.