| selnor said: The whole point is the PS3 is 'NOT' more powerful. Only Sony and it's first party devs have said it is. well known devs with no faveouritism say something quite different. And IMO, the screenshots I have seen of late look better than the Uncharted 2 ones. So I and other reviewers will never agree with you. |
And John Carmack, the guy before you said you'd trust over any Sony developer. So now that he has said it, in a post by you no less, why you not believing him? Or is it more of a case that you don't want to?
No, show how ME2 screenshots are better. This isn't artistic meret but the tech side of the engine, please show me how the soft shadows are better, how the AA is better and how there are many better post processing effects. You can choose to say you prefer ME2's graphic style, but you are wrong in saying it is more demanding than U2 and therefore the best graphics seen on a console.
If it's so obvious, why can't you show the amazing graphics off in two or three screenshots? Plus you still have yet to comment on what I pointed out on the screenshots I posted with how the soft shadows have a clear boundary, with very simple environment textures with low poly count and low AA, and of course, no field of depth.
EDIT: Just read what CGI said, and I think I'll go with what the guy who has played the actual game in motion has to say about it rather than debating screenshots.
