jefforange89 said: Unless you have a lot of money to blow, why would you want a third card for PhysX anyhow? I mean, it's not like a ton of games really use it... and anything that does, two GTX 285s in SLI should breeze through anyhow, so I somehow doubt you'd really need a third card to use PhysX effectively. |
Seconding this. I don't know what the fascination over the PhysX gimmick is in the first place, especially when ATI is coming out with an open standard soon to challenge NVidia's proprietary physics platform.
OP: What resolution are you running at, anyway? Dual GTX 285s are already way overkill for most monitors. Why would you think that you need a third?
"'Casual games' are something the 'Game Industry' invented to explain away the Wii success instead of actually listening or looking at what Nintendo did. There is no 'casual strategy' from Nintendo. 'Accessible strategy', yes, but ‘casual gamers’ is just the 'Game Industry''s polite way of saying what they feel: 'retarded gamers'."
-Sean Malstrom