Xbox 360 OWNS 2010 !

[Mazty]

Lord Flashheart said:

Mazty said:

What the hell is "Soooo much better"? You can't be taken to have a serious point when you throw around subjective and frankly silly comments like that. DA was downgraded, no point in arguing it and ME2 on the 360 has technical issues according to IGN.

You were arguing a point with yourself about lazy devs. Read that? Arguing with yourself. Pointless

The Cell is more powerful, and unlike the 360 CPU, the Cell can help out with the graphics. Considering the cards were close to begin with, it may be enough to give the PS3 the leading edge and the results seem to be there (Uncharted 2). The Cell isn't taking over - you clearly don't understand the ****** process here of how it works, and are acting as if it's a short coming of the GPU. The Cell was designed to do graphics AND processing, so not to use it for graphics would be like keeping a Ferrari from going above 40mph. Therefore it IS ideal that the Cell works in conjunction with the GPU as it was designed to do so.

Tricore is dated, and was dated back then. The PowerPC cores were meant for the Cell and the Cell is far more than just a tricore processor.

The PS3 has 512mb yes, but half of it is 256mb 700Hz (same as 360 speeds) the other is 256mb at 3.2Ghz. That's higher than DDR3 RAM today by a long shot and is 450% faster than the 360 RAM in terms of speed.

No, the AA obviously helps, but not enough. Not my fault your grasp of grammar was abysmal.

Yeah 1:09 is the end of the video, so it shows nothing other than the game name and logos....Nice. And where is the feild of depth? The textures hardly look high resolution (look at the weave of her clothing) and so on. The graphics are nice, but nothing that hasn't been done a lot better before.

Well I was dubious as whether EA had maxed it out as they aren't known for exclusive titles, but now Bungie have said they have maxed out the 360, so yeah, I don't think games on the 360 will look great in comparison to PS3 games. And yeah, ME2 is low poly count, if you can't see that from the surrounding environment you are being kidded by the bump mapping.

I'm the one talking nonsense, and yet you really expect devs to tweak games for each machine? That's not cost effective. Simple, and that's why it doesn't & won't happen. Obviously an engine made specifically for the 360 will run better on it than an engine made for the PC and ported to the 360.

http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,703669/Mass-Effect-2-Galactic-battle-Geforce-versus-Radeon/Practice/
There we are. It runs great on the 8800GT at a higher resolution than 720p. Research could help you avoid wasting time arguing some points.

Actually you are the one who mentioned the 360's power. I've stuck behind my argument that ME2 doesn't look graphically great, and to expect a non-exclusive title to be the best looking game on a console is absurd. To be blunt, I know the PS3 is more powerful than the 360 & I really don't care because my PC is more powerful than both. You're the one arguing over facts for whatever reason.

Where have I argued that DA wasn't downgraded? Again you are making baseless claims without the quote to back it up.

So now it's the speed of the ram? Not what you said. Backtracking again. you're comment was

Mazty said:

A tricore processor was hardly the best out there when it was made, and 512MB ram was still very low. And no permanent HDD and still DVD's? Yeah, that's dated.

But now it's about it's speed?

In the vid I meant 0:29 but you can't see it and deliberately choose not to. You are here for no other reason to bash the 360 and build up the PS3. You have been slagging the graphics of ME2 which is going against what every reviewer and person who has tried the game is saying in the press and on the internet. For that reasion alone you have no credibility.

I'll read the last bit of your comment as I wan't a chuckle.

Expect to see you in the Sony thread saying how sony used dated tech, bluetooth, it's GPU etc.

No oh, wonder why?

Oh I'm arguing over your opinions. You want facts... use them.

 

Oh wow, you clearly have no idea about components if you can't see the difference between 512Mb RAM @700Mhz and 256Mb RAM @700Mhz + 256Mb RAM @3.2Ghz.
No I was here to say how ME2 looks a great game, but not graphically. You are here defending some childish insecurity and trying to say that a game which runs at 60fps on an 8800GT is "best GRAFIXS EVOR!".

Go get an education in how electronics works as ignorance doesn't come across as intelligent or flattering. Fact is the PS3 is more powerful and versitle than the 360. If you don't like that, I don't care, that's how it is, get over it, but frankly that never was my point.
Plus I showed with screenshots how that video hardly shows good graphics, and anyone who says they are great has either never seen many console games or is just flat out deluded.