Game reviewers everywhere showing support for GS reviewers.

[finalsquall]

dtewi said:

finalsquall said:
This is good to see. The whole point of reviewing games is to review honestly. Making a review based or under the pressure of the gaming company is wrong and is a blatant lie that us the gamers are left open to. Gamers rely on reviews so that we can decide if our hard earn cash is worth buying the game or not. Good on Jeff for being a real gamer and gamer reviewer.

How does this apply to Gamespot, one of the most biased review sites?

 Dude make some sense.  Gamespot as a whole is a great site and I believe they are quite fair. Jeff went against the bias flow in this case, and that did not wash well with Eidos or Cnet. I respect what he did.

This can make one wonder how many sites change their reviews for advertising funding or other payments from companies to get that better review.  What it means is alot of what we rely on, may not hold as an honest review, as it is based on making a more appealing review for game sales.  So my  previous post applies to Gamespot and other sites in general.

I'm sure it's more than GS that feels this.  It's good to see the competetion support their industry members.  This could get bigger than it is now.  Maybe journalist will speak up about how this is happening everywhere.  i.e. I always hear talk how MS paid for that review etc