By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kennyheart on 24 January 2010
Edit Thread
CGI-Quality said:
Kennyheart said:
CGI-Quality said:
Kennyheart said:
CGI-Quality said:
Kennyheart said:
CGI-Quality said:
Kennyheart said:
CGI-Quality said:
God I hope not. This keeps the 360 different from the PS3. They don't need the same games.


How?

How what exactly?

Why do the 360 and PS3 games have to be diffrent.

You'd rather have the same games on TWO systems?


If there not owned by the consoule company I don't see why not.

Well, I guess we clash there. I'm sorry, exclusives shape the market, though there are definitely some noteworthy multiplats. But for two systems to have as many of the same games as the PS3 and 360 already have is a bit of a letdown to me. Fortunatley though, they have enough respectable exclusives to be worth the purchase of either one.

One of the reasons the Wii was able to take off was because it was different. You think it'd be the phenomenon it is today if it shared the 360 & PS3's multiplatform library? I'm going with a no.

Yes the wii sucess is based on it has something diffrent no one else had.But that was because of it's motion control not it's game library.

And if the system needs exclusives it's the job of the 1st party devolpers 3rd party shoulded release exclusive games it cuts there profit.

So, the Wii's library has nothing to do with it's MASSIVE success? Oh dear...

No.