gamings_best said:
PearlJam said:
Ping_ii said:
PearlJam said:
gamings_best said:
heruamon said:
Kinda like a High School (KZ franchise) team vs. a pro team (Halo). |
in trems of sales, everything is the exact opposite
|
I disagree. KZ is a "me too" shooter that wouldn't exist if Halo hadn't been so popular.
|
And Forza is just a "me too" racer that wouldn't exist if GT hadn't been around......sounds retarded doesn't it?
|
Actually no, that doesn't sound retarded at all. In fact it makes perfect sense. IMHO Forza is a direct answer to GT, MS saw the popularity and sales of GT so they made their own similar racer. IMHO if GT wasn't so pouplar and successful, we probably wouldn't have Forza.
Sorry guy this isn't about Sony vs MS for me, I'm actually a GT guy as I prefer it to Forza. It's a very similar situation, I think Sony does Racers better but I think MS has had better shooters.
|
Forza and GT5 are sims that can be compared, tracks, gameplay, features, etc.
Kilzone and Halo are shooters............................ and that's it case closed, where forza and gt have the same audience it's no where near the same for killzone and halo, sony wants a halo for ps3, maybe, but killzone for damn sure isn't the answer, it's way to nich and for the hardcore fps gamers.
|
I'm pretty sure Sony would have rather had Halo-like succes for KZ, just because that didn't happen doesn't mean they didn't try. They're more comparable to each other then they are to generic military shooter like COD, Battlefield, Ghost Recon or Rainbow Six.
