papflesje said: Couldn't care less about shooting something down. Have seen and played ME2 several months ago and back in August, so already knew it was top notch. Besides, once a review says something to detract what you call "the ps3's supposed graphical lead", you're backing it up? Seems equally hypocritical of what you're accusing me. (since i've said every time in this thread that it is impossible to judge what criteria the reviewer exactly used without him specifying). Where are you with the face-value argument when every party is trying to spin NPD results? Then it's no longer face value, but spin? Stick to one story. |
I have one story. I am reading a review, in which the reputable reviewer said that Mass Effect 2 had better visuals than the competition. If you would like, create a thread in the gaming forum arguing that high definition games across the Xbox 360 and PS3 are not in competition with one another. See how far you get.
Ultimately, you have come into the Microsoft forum's, started attacking a poster who (again, in the MICROSOFT forums) reached a perfectly logical pro-Xbox 360 conclusion based off this review and now you're sitting around wondering why people didn't take kindly too it.
Now please, grow up and kindly leave the thread if you have nothing positive to contribute.
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS