CGI-Quality said:
selnor said:
papflesje said:
Just so people know to GeoW 2 got 10 for graphics, ME2 a 9.5. So that clearly isnt the guage for what they think. Who knows why it's 9.5.
So you don't know why the score would be different, but you DO know what "the competition" means? :) Unless you wrote the piece or know the writer, you cannot know what he meant with competition. Maintaining your point, just illustrates the "stubbornness" I previously mentioned.
For you could also list "competition" as anything that has a cinematic experience, meaning every movie as well. It could even mean everything that engages you and that could even mean football for some people. Agreed, he is probably limiting it to the gaming world, we can pretty much make that statement. Saying it either fits the 360, everything gaming, rpg's and so on are not possible as statements. |
LOL. The twists keep coming. Get over it. If they meant RPG's they would have said that. If they meant 360, they would have said that. They always have done. I'm the one reading the words and taking them at face value. It's others trying to implement they only mean 360 or RPG's.
|
But, if they meant best looking game on consoles, wouldn't they have said that as well? They had no problems calling Gears 2, Killzone 2, & Uncharted 2 that. What makes Mass Effect 2 any different IF that's how they felt? I think you'll find that, mutually, everyone is making an assumption here, including you selnor. Problem is, you're not willing to hear the other side. That's why people continue to debate with you about it.
I'm not saying that you're right or wrong, you could be either one. I'm just thinking about both sides here, and as of now, nothing is absolute and we'll never know which is.
|
Selnor has this going for him.
He IS taking things at face value.
It's you guys that have gotten so protective of the PS3's supposed graphical lead that you've felt it necessary to hijack a 360 Mass Effect 2 thread to shoot down IGN's review.
