IGN are not developers, No way in hell does ME2 have better voice acting than Uncharted 2 Nor does its Graphical level beat Uncharted 2.
According to Battlefield 2 Developers, they Stated that Uncharted 2 have the best graphics they'av ever seen and no game have been able to surpassed it and the same goes for ME2.
IGN are reviewers, they loved the game so they love to hype it up so that consumers can anticipate it.
So when they said Uncharted2 was better than the competition for graphics, I guess they knew nothing then. LOL.
Do you know Mass Effect 2 has some of the worlds renowned actors doing VA? Bioware are tremendously good at all these things. Best devs in the world for cinematic gaming.
But that's not what they said. They said Uncharted 2 was not only the best looking game on any console, but that it had no equal (the best of the best these days).
Seeing as they also gave Uncharted 2 a 10/10 for graphics, and Mass Effect a 9.5, I think they're telling you which they think looks better. Not only that, but Uncharted 2 has a 4-page review and a second opinion review. Like I said before selnor, it doesn't matter either way, but you have been claiming what they meant without anything solid and without knowing for sure..
I'm not claiming anything. I'm reading the words and taking it a face value. Anything else is speculation ( which is what everyone else is doing ). So far Ive heard they only mean 360, or they only mean RPG's. It's quite rediculous. All because it doesnt fall within the PS3 better than 360 arguement. As for the 10/10 and 9.5 out of 10 arguement. Gears 2 got 10 for graphics, are you telling me they think Gears 2 is better? Times change. Which brings me to what they said about Uncharted 2. That review was before ME2 came out. Again times have moved on.
No, it has nothing to do with PS3>360, at least not from me. It's just that, like you said, it's speculation. Difference is, you're running with it like it's absolute, but then when other people run with their theory as an absolute, you peg them as wrong/ridiculous.
Either side could be right or wrong. Bottomline is, those who are disagreeing with you raise one good point IMO, if they meant what you say they meant, why wouldn't they have just said 'best looking game on consoles'? And remember, I'm not personally said you're wrong for sure, you may not be. I'm just telling you to consider the other side, you COULD be.
I understand. But I find it hard to believe they would be that vague without meaning competition as all other games. If they were being precise, surely they would have stated 360 precisely? Competition includes all consoles does it not? They said best visual experience to date about Gears 2 for example. So would that mean on 360? Or everything? Whereas with Forza 3 they said best on 360. So I cant see it being anything other than all games competition.
Got to remember the review was a joint PC 360 review, plus the PC will have better graphics, and the 360 had tech issues. Also, you are only kidding yourself if you think it's better than games like Crysis. Either way IGN has gone down in my estimation as they use vague terms like that to hype a game up. As far as I can see the graphics are okay but lacking the important parts such as soft shadows and field of depth.
Well Mass Effect 2 playthrough is on Youtube now. Definately has soft shadows and ' depth of field '. And the review was the 360 one. As they said if you play on PC everything is a bit better everywhere. Also found a great 360 HD video.
The effects, particle, fire explosions are stunning.
Really clean video. ( You said the other I posted was crap quality. ) I think it's the best Ive seen for consoles.
Change the quality from 320p to 720p with the contoller.
