MaxwellGT2000 said:
For discussions sake, has you or anyone ever seen a so called "professional" game site retract a statement publically about a review or editorial? I mean it doesn't happen often with news papers and news on the TV, but it happens, because they WANT to protect their professional credability, why don't game sites do this? Or do it more often, cause it seems like they can do no wrong honestly, like Bozon has done nothing but fight tooth and nail about that CoD4 review and it had some factually wrong statements about it. Like its one thing for it to be an opinion that people think is wrong, that you don't have to retract unless its unneeded hate for no reason, but when you state things like "the controls are looser and worse than the previous game" and everyone and their brother is like no they're not, then a developer called you out and states how it uses the same IR control engine just with The Conduit style options included, then you have a factually wrong statement and can be proven wrong, you need to retract things like that. |
This is a big reason I hate the gaming press in general. They have turned into Fox News, which doesn't suck because of its viewpoint, but because it's a tabloid channel disguising itself as real news (not the other cable news networks are great, CNN is spineless and MSNBC is trying to be the liberal Fox News, but not be so blatant as Air America was).
The gaming press is now largely like that.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs