By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
selnor said:
Mazty said:
selnor said: snip

 

 

Fair enough but still it looks good. Plus it's not the only title out there - take Uncharted 2, God of War III, Heavy Rain etc. There are games that already look like they'll beat the quite frankly unimpressive graphics of ME2. I can't see how or why you are placing so much weight on a non-exclusive title. As with all multiplatform titles, they never use any console to their full potential/get dumbed down for consoles as it's easier/quicker, so ME2 may look nice, but it'll hardly be the best looking game on xbox or PC for that matter.


Well IGN disagree with you.

This is taken straight from there review.

"It's incredibly personal while still retaining a sense of epic sweeping scale. The combat and mission design are outstanding. The visuals, voice acting, soundtrack, and direction are miles ahead of the competition. Perhaps most impressively, Mass Effect 2 manages to fulfill its incredible ambition while only suffering from very few technical hiccups.

THe competition logically are going to be other multiplatform titles, not other exclusives, and no where does it say PS3 titles. Not to mention IGN are part of the overall hype machine as their reviews have gone from being infortmative to now unexplained praise. Why are the graphics so good? What does it do so well? I couldn't see any field of depth effects, nor high models etc.

Oh and not to mention the review is a combined 360 & PC review. Considering the two will be different in terms of graphics (and the 360 suffered from tech issues no less) to say the graphics are that good is BS. Crysis will look better, and even Far Cry 2 probably looks far better in terms of competition. Saying it's so good but not stating the competition makes a potentially informative phrase nothing but useless.