Rath said:
So basically both studies were done by other sides of the debate? |
Pretty much.
The second one has slightly more validity, i'd say, since it's only problem is REALLY paranoid people.
Vs the second study who's method is really quite insane. (We're supposed to assume someone charging with a knife is coming in for a hug?)
but both are pretty crappy.
Those are the two big studies debated in Academia though.
There are very few gun studies that are legitamite so even amatuer stats work done with available numbers is helpful. (no offense stick.)
To be fair, it's even tough to do a study like that in the USA just because of how different every state is.