nightsurge said:
I still don't follow you nor Pachter's logic. Microsoft obviously offered them an incentive in this deal, same as any first/second party developer. You don't sign contracts for exclusivity without some sort of incentives! So as I said, if that's really what Pachter is saying, then any and all first party devs on either platform should be crying rivers because of all the lost profit and there would be no more exclusives. |
Ok, I see your error now. There is no "lost profits" when considering Pacter's statements, just greater profits that could be obtained if Epic wanted to do a multiplat deal. Also, you are indeed correct with the detail that MS did offer an incentive to stay exclusive, BUT you miss the bigger picture, as neither MS nor epic were really expecting the success of the PS3 slim, and because of that MS wouldnt have been offering epic as much for exclusivity on Gears, if they knew that it would be rocking the ball out of the park every week with hardware.
I dont think that you realize you dont have to pay all that much for exclusivity when your console is clearly beating the other one, like 360 has over the PS3 for a while now, so Pacter is just saying that if they weren't locked into a contract, that epic could get a better deal by going multiplat. There's no reason to pay an incentive to stay exclusive when your console is the only choice ( excluding the wii of course) that is selling.