CrazyHorse said:
3D made the avatar film. The story was nothing special but the visual effects were fantastic. I have absolutely no desite to buy Avatar until I have a decent 3D home set-up (however long that may take). The difference with Avatar and many other films is it that the 3D was done to enhance the film as opposed to adding a sales gimick of having things pop-out to 'scare' you. If games and other film are desinged the same way there is no reason it won't become the standard form of media in the future (obviously we're talking at least 5-10 years here). |
I think you will find that Avatar is good in both 2D and 3D. Does it make a significant difference that would require I spend additional money, I am not so sure. If I was to look at "Up" as a recent well made 3D film then the answer is no. I cannot say the same for Avatar but when I watched Up in 2D I did not sit there thinking the 3D was so much better than this. 3D has its place but the additional outlay and the bloody glasses do not make me a fan right now.
Hence why I still think it has some way to go. Sony are leveraging it as an advantage as an organisation and I think when you see articles with titles suchs "Sony is pinning all its hopes on 3D" you realise that it may be risky. They are in a good position to be in the right place when it baloons I am just not so sure it will happen in the next few years.
W.L.B.B. Member, Portsmouth Branch.
(Welsh(Folk) Living Beyond Borders)
Winner of the 2010 VGC Holiday sales prediction thread with an Average 1.6% accuracy rating. I am indeed awesome.
Kinect as seen by PS3 owners ...if you can pick at it ...post it ... Did I mention the 360 was black and Shinny? Keeping Sigs obscure since 2007, Passed by the Sig police 5July10.