By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Carl2291 said:
llewdebkram said:
It's funny listening to them promoting something you know wouldn't have existed without Nintendo and the Wii.

It's funny knowing that 3rd parties are already backing the PS3 Remote with blockbuster hardcore games

Perhaps I missed the news. What 3rd party blockbuster hardcore games were announced using PS3 remote other than RE5AE (which I'm not even sure if it supports motion controllers anymore now that it's delayed until Fall)?

Crazymann said:
First of all, Sony doesn't get to decide what the "defacto" controller is... the consumers do. Sony saying that is arrogance along the lines of - "we'll sell 5 million with no games."

Sony can push all they want, but the userbase wants DS3 instead, then DS3 it will be - eventually after the game sales tank and companies get the picture.

As for this, I say "bad move." If I want motion control, I have a Wii. Even on my Wii, I use the GC controller almost any time it is an option. I would wager that I am not the only one that feels this way.

This sounds like the arguement about Sony's 10 year plan for PS3.



MikeB predicts that the PS3 will sell about 140 million units by the end of 2016 and triple the amount of 360s in the long run.