Why is there an article explaining a game review? Why isn't the review enough of an article about the game? This seems weird to me. It's almost like he is defending the score for no reason at all.
Also, I am dubious as to why an outlet doing their own review would interview a third party about a separate review. I don't know; the whole thing just seems weird, or if I may be so bold, set-up.
I'll reserve my purchase decision after some more reviews and user feedback.
"Man is born free but is everywhere in chains" - Rousseau