rocketpig said:
I'm sorry but saying that the generation has run its course graphically is silly. Just because some games hiccup and have bad framerates, screen tearing, etc. at the expense of graphics now doesn't mean that future improvements won't be made when dealing with the hardware. Most companies are still on their first game with this generation. You can't expect them to suddenly stop improving this generation when every generation in history has shown steady graphical improvement over its life. Do you seriously think that Gears 2 won't look better than the original? As far as AI, I can't think of a game last generation that offers the AI immersion and intelligence of a game like Assassin's Creed. It's definitely not perfect but there is an improvement there, without a doubt. Older systems couldn't even handle the crowds of the newer games, much less the improved AI. |
I think the point is there IS a lot of incremental improvement and those will continue as developers master the new systems. However, the change from PS2 to PS3 or Xbox to 360 is nothing compared to the change from 2d to 3d environments or other changes that a new generation of systems have brought in the past. I look at a game like Virtual Fighter 5 and yeah, sure, it's pretty, but does it play any different than VF4? Most, if not all, games so far, have been the same games we've already played, just prettier, more crowds, lighting, etc.
The one game that in my mind might really seem 'next gen' is Force Unleashed. If your not familiar with what LucasArts is doing with that goto IGN and check it out. But still, although it'll make the world seem 'real' gameplay may remain essentially the same.







