Demotruk said:
letsdance said:
"Our updated analysis indicates that the initial bill of [production] materials for PS3 could approach $900," read the report. The report said that the production cost of a single Cell processor will be $230 at launch, with the Blu-ray drive setting Sony back $350 per unit. However, the $900 price tag presumably includes a $100 optional hard drive, as a breakdown of component costs in the report totals just $795.
If the $900 estimate is correct, that means the PS3 would have to sell for around $775-$800 to maintain a $100-$125 per-unit loss similar to that of Microsoft's Xbox 360. If the $795 estimate is correct, the console could sell for around $699--within the range recently forecast by a group of analysts and developers polled by CNN/Money.
This week, iSuppli conducted a similar cost-analysis study of the PlayStation 3--with even more shocking results. According to the study, the hardware for the 20-gigabyte PS3 costs $805.85 alone--$306.85 more than the stated list price of $499. The 60GB model hardware costs $840.35, $241.35 more than the console's $599 sticker price
That figure also doesn’t take into consideration the costs of packaging, software, royalties, and marketing Sony has to pay out.
|
$795 does not equal $900. Components are what the PS3 has been judged on at all times, are you suggesting that they've made massive savings in software, packaging, royalties and marketing...?
|
Well the slim covers packaging while the psp go covers packaging and software savings and anyways this is US they're loved more by Europe