By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Torillian said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
"I can do that, if you stop BSing about reviewers at every oppurtunity. There are always fans of games that say it deserves higher reviews, if reviewers listened to general opinion every Wii game would be in the 7-9 range and then people would complain about inflation."

That's not why I'm mistrusting reviewers. When they get wined and dined for good reviews, and half their Wii reviews have factual inaccuracies (just some more than others), their credibility is shot. Not for the Wii, but for any game.

And you declaring I'm supposed to find the game below average is just as bad as what you hated form the Tales fans (good series, but not a spectacular one).

I'm not declaring you're supposed to find the game below average, I'm telling you that assuming every review is wrong is assinine.  Reviews in general are a good way to tell if a game is worth spending money on.  You found the game above average instead of below, and some reviewers did as well, but that doesn't mean that all the reviewers that said it was below average are wrong. 

Poor credibility is not the same as being wrong.

And if it's a good way, why did they give good reviews to an even shorter game with no replay value?



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs