Kasz216 said:
The fact that you can't see it explains the problems you have with the genre. You seem to not understand the general basis of videogames as an art in your attempts to try and compare it to other forms of art.
It'd be equilvent to trying to judge a book based on it's pictures... since that's how you judge a painting. |
Actually, no, that's not the sole criteria in judging a painting. I'm an artist, mind you, with a classical background, and I work in the videogame industry.
I understand videogames as an art, I just don't think a videogame is solely about the gameplay. While one of the things that sets games apart from other media is player input, that isn't it's sole defining characteristic.
But further discussion is a moot point, we both have different opinions. Mario isn't a masterpiece, it's a good game with limited goals, and people project stuff to it that just isn't there.
And the whole "comparing games to movies thing is wrong" is just a fashionable thing to say, all art forms and media have different characteristics, but they have always adapted elements and cross-polinated with each other, it's called synergy. Saying two different media are different and cannot relate is an extremely oversimplistic way of putting things. Besides the fact you are putting way too much literal meaning into this, I already said a cinematic game and cinema are two different things, in no part of my posts did I say games needed to be like cinema. That just gets you the interactive movie that is MGS4.