Rant;
These threads are all the same. Nothing ever changes.
Each camp will support their own and no one can tell them any different.
U2 is regarded by many respected reviewers as the console graphics king.
Just because you may be anti-sony or PS3 doesn't change that.
You make hate a movie but that doesn't take away the oscars it has won, neither does the individual who won the oscar(s) care about most people's opinion.
I know the OP article mentioned the PC but getting into PC v console arguments are %^$&*.
"Everyday" a new graphics card and CPU is released for the PC so why compare it to a console that is stagnant for years and has hardware that is "outdated" even before it's release.
End rant;
OT: Both HD consoles are great but with their own advantages and disadvantages.
Having all that power that is embedded in the cell is great to talk about but unless this power is fully utilised it all amounts to toilet.
The x360 can produce better looking games than PS3 in the future if PS3 devs don't get to understand or tap into it's full potential.
Do PS3 owners have to wait 7-8years before they see what the cell is truly capable of?
If that's the case then both HD consoles are graphically pretty equal as it stands now and likely to be for a while yet.
One more rant;
This site doesn't cover PC hardware or software sales so why have a forum for PCs?
End of rant;