By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Xoj said:
marc said:
Yes yes... Go play some high end PC games then come back and tell me that your console can handle as many objects, and effect on high settings as a $400 PC.

Never compare a console to the PC. You will get splattered & left to rot under a bus. My Radeon 3850 makes Fallout 3 look like its playing on a XB720 or PS4 and that card is 2 generations old and I have at least 8 mods running that quadruple the number of enemies in game. Last I checked the PS3 had trouble maintaining 30fps in vanilla Fallout 3 at about medium PC settings.

then a game like killzone 2 or uncharted 2 would make your PC sweat.

bad comparsion, lousy port, of a PC developed game.

and killzone 2 dont have tiny maps, they are actually huge.

especially the desert


Uhm no, sorry to burst your bubble but Killzone 2 and Uncharted "areas" are puny by PC standards. Now let me hear another execuse like graphic quality > gameplay. Whatever thats your opinion. Unfortunatly we cannot run your games on the PC but Ive heard your flamebait before. Your opinion has no basis in logic whatsoever. What kind of machines do you think they used when they programmed the game to begin with? Where do you think the graphics were created? Hint, it was not on a PS3.

Anyway, this is why I compare a cross platform game & for the record, Fallout 3 was console based and dumbed down significantly for the PC just like Oblivion. Oblivion remains one of the most resented games on the PC by PC gamers because of how far it was dumbed down. Hell, even to this day Fallout 3 doesnt run properly for many people on the PC. Still think it was PC based?