marc said:
MS could have bulldozed Sony with twice the price drop but they didnt probably because they didnt think it was needed. My opinion on the matter is that they should have burried Sony when they had the chance but the problem with MS is that they cannot overcome Sony's PR machine. I have family that arrived in the US a year ago who purchased PS3's because they have never even heard of the XBox. Of course none of them are avid gamers but this is what MS cannot fight even with a huge price drop. What the price drop would have done was end Sony's hope of ever winning back the West & UK and in my opinion that would have enough to make it a viable strategy but MS clearly disagrees with me there. It would also tip some countries that are 50/50 in their favor. But even a huge price drop would never effect Japan, and several other Sony dominated countries. To get those countries MS needs something that seperates it from the pack, very much like Nintendo but I dont think the Natal will be enough in those coutries in this generation. It will be pivotal next gen especially if Sony (and Nintendo for that matter) has nothing equivalent to offer. A Sony Wii-mote is definitly not equivalent tech. |
I never argued against the profitability part. But marketshare is just as important, and 2009 put a huge dent against Microsoft's marketshare. If Microsoft had the chance to make Sony bleed more money they would take that route without hesitation. But the fact that they let things play out the way it is right now makes me think they still don't have a green light for another price cut.
Next gen, well, all I'll say is I hope it isn't too one-sided towards any company.
Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!
Kojima: Come out with Project S already!