PS3 smoothing beyond that of high-end PC graphics card

[Garnett]

XxXProphecyXxX said:

Garnett said:

leo-j said:

marc said:
Yes yes... Go play some high end PC games then come back and tell me that your console can handle as many objects, and effect on high settings as a $400 PC.

Never compare a console to the PC. You will get splattered & left to rot under a bus. My Radeon 3850 makes Fallout 3 look like its playing on a XB720 or PS4 and that card is 2 generations old and I have at least 8 mods running that quadruple the number of enemies in game. Last I checked the PS3 had trouble maintaining 30fps in vanilla Fallout 3 at about medium PC settings.

Fallout 3 is one of the worst looking games this gen on consoles..

 

Play killzone 2 and then come back and say the ps3 can't handle good graphics.

Fallout 3 looks bad on PS3? Sure

 

On 360 its gorgeous.

 

 

Yeh cause Im sure the difference are so HUGE that the ps3 version looks like a ps1 game compared to 360, funny thing is when games like U2,KZ2,heavy rain,GT5 which ppl can see that is a graphically advanced comapred to multiplat and 360 games ppl are so quick on the "but it's not that huge of a difference" but then the same ppl makes big deal out of mini differences from most multiplats "ZOMG no AA on ps3 version or you can see batmans cape its not black on 360 ZOMG 360 is better", is this really how sad you ppl are?

1.UC2 graphics are NOT that good, the only good thing i can say about them is the lighting thats it. 

2.Heavy Rain has GTA graphics. (on high on PC, there still improving so i cant really say yet)

3.Fallout3 does look better on 360, it has better textures and what not.

4.GoW3 AND KZ2 are easly the power house graphic kings on PS3. 

Thats for you. 

 

now Marc

 

1.PC is NOT hard to dev for like PS3 is.

2.When the Fallout3 devs made it they had to work with the PS3/360 and PC. Which means the one that is hardest to dev for gets the least results.