Killergran on 16 January 2010
I cannot agree with that article at all.
The basis of any art shouldn't be to move forward, it should be to deliver the best quality possible. What level of technology you use is not a relevant measure of quality, or how lazy you are, nor is how difficult the process is. And using 25 year old ideas is not in itself a bad thing, if the audience still find the ideas fresh.
Yet this is what he basis his conclusions on. And I cannot agree with any of it.
This is invisible text!
