Third Party Devs have made up their minds about the Wii.

[Procrastinato]

Khuutra said:

Procrastinato said:

Khuutra said:

I'm not calling your honesty into question here, but could you source that? I'm really curious, now.

It's pretty easy to find.  Here's the first thing I came up with in Google:

link 

My point was to illustrate that 3rd parties were comparing re-used engines (GameCube engines, which are basically Wii engines) to brand new PS3/360 engines, when those "1/4th to 1/3rd" quotes were made.  That's no longer the case.

That's a good link

Though it's sort of ironic how it points out that the game is an anomaly in terms of HD budgets

At the time, it was, because it used a pre-existing engine, which most HD games, to that point, hadn't had the advantage of.

The "is" in your statement above, should read "was".  That article wasn't written yesterday... that's my point.